I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
{ 34, 46, 48, 36, 25, 11, 13, 27 },。谷歌浏览器【最新下载地址】对此有专业解读
無子女夫婦：寵物就是我們的孩子2019年9月22日，推荐阅读WPS下载最新地址获取更多信息
Global news & analysis。51吃瓜对此有专业解读
A separate claim that his co-host John Torode had used a severely offensive racist term was also substantiated. Torode has said he has "no recollection" of the incident.